Prediction of Shahar Peer vs Melinda Czink Head-to-Head, At

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
S. Peer vs M. Czink

Shahar Peer

ISR

3

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

1.70m

Height

1.78m

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

$2.9M

Career Money

$514.2K

Right-handed (two-handed backhand)

Plays

Left-handed (two-handed backhand)

Melinda Czink

HUN

3

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

1.70m

Height

1.78m

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

$2.9M

Career Money

$514.2K

Right-handed (two-handed backhand)

Plays

Left-handed (two-handed backhand)

Head-to-head: Peer 3 - 0 Czink

They have played 7 sets in total, with Shahar Peer winning 6 and Melinda Czink winning 1. The last match between Shahar Peer and Melinda Czink was at the Bank of the West Classic - Stanford, 15-07-2008, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Shahar Peer getting the victory 7-5 6-0.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Peer	3
Czink	0

Last 3 H2H Matches:

(R1) Bank of the West Classic - Stanford(07-15-08)

Stats

Shahar Peer

Melinda Czink

(R2) Regions Morgan Keegan Championships - Memphis(02-27-08)

Stats

Shahar Peer

Melinda Czink

(R1) PTT Bangkok Open - Bangkok(10-09-07)

Stats

Shahar Peer

Melinda Czink

S. Peer vs M. Czink H2H Profile

S. Peer	Stats	M. Czink
$2,894,734	Career Prize Money	$514,237
58.08% (388-280)	Career Total W/L	55.54% (376-301)
2	Hard	0
1	Indoor	0
9	Titles	14
3	Total H2H Matches	0
0% (0-0)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

S. Peer vs M. Czink Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Shahar Peer has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Melinda Czink has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Shahar Peer, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Melinda Czink has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Shahar Peer has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Melinda Czink has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Shahar Peer has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Melinda Czink winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Shahar Peer has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 60% (W/L 247/165), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 44% (W/L 18/23). Melinda Czink has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 60% (W/L 149/110), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 53% (W/L 32/28).
Player level: In the last year, Shahar Peer has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Melinda Czink has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 3 times before with Shahar Peer winning 3 times and Melinda Czink being victorious 0 times. They have played 7 sets in total, with Shahar Peer winning 6 and Melinda Czink winning 1.
The last match between Shahar Peer and Melinda Czink was at the Bank of the West Classic - Stanford, 15-07-2008, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Shahar Peer getting the victory 7-5 6-0.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Shahar Peer has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Melinda Czink has played against players with an average rank of 0.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Shahar Peer has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Melinda Czink has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Shahar Peer has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Melinda Czink has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Shahar Peer vs Melinda Czink Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

S. Peer vs M. Czink H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

S. Peer	Stats	M. Czink
3	H2H Matches Won	0
6	Sets Won	1
41	Games Won	23
5	Aces (Total)	1
2	Total Double Faults	10
0:0:0	Average Match Time	0:0:0
62% (76/122)	1st Serve %	58% (78/135)
66% (50/76)	1st Serve Win %	68% (53/78)
70% (32/46)	2nd Serve Win %	33% (19/57)
47% (8/17)	Break Pts Won %	50% (3/6)
47% (63/135)	Return Points Win %	33% (40/122)
100% (3/3)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	0% (0/3)
100% (1/1)	Deciding Set Win %	0% (0/1)
100% (3/3)	1st Set Won, Won Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/3)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	0% (0/3)

Recent Performance Stats

S. Peer Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Abierto Monterrey Afirme - Monterrey - 29-02-2016
Q1 Viktorija GolubicV. Golubic	L	6-4 7-5	Stats
Rio Open - Rio de Janeiro - 15-02-2016
Q1 Paula Cristina GoncalvesP. Cristina	L	6-2 6-3	Stats
Fed Cup, Europe/Africa Zone Group I - 01-02-2016
Rubber 1 Kateryna VolodkoK. Volodko	L	6-1 6-1	Stats
Rubber 1 Tena LukasT. Lukas	W	3-6 6-1 6-2	Stats
Rubber 1 Valeria GorlatsV. Gorlats	W	6-0 6-3	Stats

View All

M. Czink Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
The OEC Taipei WTA Ladies Open - Taipei - 03-11-2014
R1 Vitalia DiatchenkoV. Diatchenko	L	6-3 6-2	Stats
Yinzhou Bank International - Ningbo - 27-10-2014
R1 Yafan WangY. Wang	L	4-6 6-3 6-1	Stats
Monterrey - 06-10-2014
Q2 Petra JanuskovaP. Januskova	W	6-3 7-6(5)	Stats
Q3 Laura Pous-TioL. Pous-Tio	W	4-6 6-4 6-3	Stats
R2 Julia GlushkoJ. Glushko	L	6-4 4-2 ret.	Stats

View All

S. Peer vs M. Czink Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

S. Peer	Stats	M. Czink
58.35% (388/277)	YTD Win/Loss	55.14% (370/301)
56.14% (855/668)	Sets Win/Loss	53.77% (842/724)
52.37% (7235/6580)	Games Win/Loss	51.69% (7483/6995)
59.95% (247/165)	Hard Win/Loss	53.77% (164/141)
57.53% (84/62)	Clay Win/Loss	57.53% (149/110)
59.09% (39/27)	Indoor Hard W/L	53.19% (25/22)
43.90% (18/23)	Grass Win/Loss	53.33% (32/28)
0.08	Aces Per Game	0.09
551	Aces Total	622
0.23	Double Faults Per Game	0.17
1575	Total Double Faults	1202
1st Match	Average Match Time	1st Match
513.72	Average Opponent Rank	44.33
65% (21212/32646)	1st Serve %	63% (11188/17857)
61% (12882/21212)	1st Serve Win %	64% (7139/11188)
44% (5081/11441)	2nd Serve Win %	46% (3029/6622)
48% (2024/4236)	Break Points Won % (Total)	44% (839/1923)
46% (15135/32818)	Return Points Win %	42% (7411/17630)
57.14% (60/45)	Slam W/L	42.65% (29/39)
54.84% (85/70)	Masters W/L	44.83% (26/32)
61.76% (21/13)	Cups W/L	0% (0/0)
59.43% (189/129)	Main Tour W/L	50.57% (132/129)
62.26% (33/20)	Challenger W/L	64.52% (180/99)
0% (0/0)	Futures W/L	60.00% (3/2)
58% (384/659)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	56% (366/657)
100% (2/2)	Best of 5 Sets Win %	0% (0/1)
57% (71/125)	Tiebreaks Win % (Total)	50% (81/162)
58% (114/195)	Deciding Set Win %	56% (133/237)
87% (370/321)	1st Set Won, Won Match	84% (350/294)
13% (370/49)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	16% (350/56)
23% (295/67)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	24% (321/77)